Architect applicants have rated the interview process at AECOM with 3 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty) and assessed their interview experience as 100% positive. To compare, the company-average is 78.6% positive. This is according to Glassdoor user ratings.
Candidates applying for Architect roles take an average of 90 days to get hired, when considering 2 user submitted interviews for this role. To compare, the hiring process at AECOM overall takes an average of 45 days.
Common stages of the interview process at AECOM as a Architect according to 2 Glassdoor interviews include:
One on one interview: 40%
Skills test: 40%
Presentation: 20%
Here are the most commonly searched roles for interview reports -
Unclear and very long winded process.
There were some basic knowledge questions, questions about the job and hobbies
it began with a presentation of the company, their values and core principles
I applied online. The process took 7 months. I interviewed at AECOM (Markham, ON) in Oct 2023
Interview
I saw the job posting on Linked in, applied online in Linked in, AECOM internal recruiter contacted me, then I had three interviews. One with the recruiter, one with the management team, and last with one of the project managers.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
There were more technical questions regarding the previous projects that I worked on, the reason that I’m interested in joining AECOM
I applied through an employee referral. The process took 4 months. I interviewed at AECOM (Andheri) in Jan 2025
Interview
The interview process was smooth initially, but the compensation offered was not competitive for the role and responsibilities discussed. After raising concerns and having a conversation about salary expectations, there was complete radio silence from the recruiter — no closure or follow-up. It was disappointing to experience such a lack of professionalism, especially after investing time and effort in the process.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Pros:
Interview panel was polite and professional
Questions were clear and relevant to the role
Cons:
Salary offered was below market expectations
No follow-up after compensation discussion
Unprofessional communication post-interview