Condé Nast reviews

3.1

41% would recommend to a friend

(1,883 total reviews)
avatar

Roger Lynch

36% approve of CEO

29% positive business outlook

Condé Nast has an employee rating of 3.1 out of 5 stars, based on 1,883 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Condé Nast employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Media and communication industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
2.0
Jan 19, 2016

"Grad Scheme"

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Excellent pay for a first job and in comparison with other departments at the company.

Cons

Essentially, this isn't a grad scheme as I understood it would be. It's a media sales role which involves cold calling people to sell ad space in classified (the section at the back of the magazine). I found the office a really strange and outdated environment to be in. (It's almost school-like... everyone faces the front of the office to face the director, you have to make X calls per day, you can't leave the office for regular breaks etc.) Most girls who work there (it's an all girl office) seem overly stressed. I was at the company for over nine months and turn over is unbelievably high. My guess is that many people (like me) didn't find the role challenging enough. During the time I was there, there was no opportunity for me to go out and meet clients face to face, as promised in the job advert. There were even some girls who had been there for more than 18 months who had never attended a meeting with their clients. Oddly, meeting clients is discouraged by the management team. In terms of training, other than your induction week which is spent in the classroom learning sales techniques taught to you by senior sales executives and managers, I was offered very little training and I believe that zero digital sales training in classified. Progressing within the company itself is really hard, although people have done it in the past. This is because you're competing with people from other media companies who have digital and face to face sales experience. As such, many people leave to go to competitor titles. Also, hardly any account manager roles inhouse were advertised during the time I worked there. Working for the 'Grad Scheme' you feel very isolated from the rest of the company- for instance, Classified is apparently the only department which has to pay for their own Xmas party! We were rarely invited to events and talks or even to meet the editorial and, or advertising team representing the magazines each person worked on. Although I did attend one hour-long talk at The Condè Nast College.

1.0
Oct 29, 2018

Unfair Dismissal - British GQ

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Worked on some great events, lovely and friendly team, good company perks, the role itself was enjoyable, editor was pleasant to work for, saw progression and exciting opportunities within the business

Cons

Malicious and calculated very unexpected dismissal due to restructure of the team (two weeks before 6 month probationary period end date) however no HR representative present during dismissal Dismissal took roughly 60 seconds, no meeting scheduled, no seat offered, and no thanks given for working extremely hard for the past six months Failure to consult on any improvement needed during probationary period, only praise was given Failure to consult that the team was being restructured and my role specifically in advance, allowing myself some time and ease No opportunity/referral given to move into a new role within the business after only positive feedback from Editor himself and other directors The company as a whole failed their duty of care for an employee Seedy emails between editor and cover employee who has now funnily enough replaced the role HR department terminated contract without confirming in person, terminated building access pass and computer log in details before allowing me to collect my belongings and schedule a formal HR meeting Company tramples over young enthusiastic hard-working employees to keep hierarchy happy Company and senior figures more concerned about saving money and hiring for cheap labour rather than hiring experienced well knowledgable members of staff

1.0
Jul 2, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Colleagues are great (because we're all in the same sinking ship), office is great, as another reviewer said, Wolfgang the Chief Operating Officer is great but sadly surrounded by incompetent/inconsiderate leadership. Benefit package is the standard ones you get in corporate companies (travel/bike loan, private health insurance, etc.) 25 days holiday is on the high-end of average, which is nice.

Cons

Since the new Chief Product and Technology Officer came in the decision has been made to open a new third HQ in central/eastern Europe (because cheap labour). Since COVID they've pivoted to now opening an HQ in India. This is great for a multinational company although with hiring being severely restricted even before the pandemic, all new vacancies within the engineering department are being hired in India -- because its cheaper (not the official word, but it's obvious why). With hiring being difficult, it's made back-filling roles in either London or New York impossible. We started getting contractors in but now everyone is being hired in India. Pay is not great. Pay equality is worse. Zero career progression. Don't even bother asking for experience, either. They boast about diversity and inclusion but are extremely and painfully slow following through with action.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 1,883 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,478 Condé Nast reviews submitted anonymously by Condé Nast employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Condé Nast is right for you.