Fake and Disconnected - Anonymous employee Baker Hughes Employee Review

1.0
Oct 21, 2022
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

• Decent graduate salary of £32-33K • International exposure and varied experiences • Learning opportunities, with plenty of resources • Diverse pool of people from all regions • Flexible working

Cons

• The program is pivoting to becoming a backfilling method, rather than a ‘leadership’ program, leaving you with little more skills than a glorified internship • Menial duties, offering ‘carrot and stick’ philosophy to push productivity • Unrealistic number of online, prerecorded learning modules to complete, alongside generic compliance modules as well, whilst doing your ‘day job’ • Competition between ASPIREs is unhealthy and cultivates a toxic culture, creating playground bullying and childish rumours • Complete lack of transparency, very tactical and political culture pushed by middle management and program leaders (S&C) • No investment in accreditations or qualifications since GE split • Assignment leaders (ALs) for rotations are not monitored, or trained, pushing all accountability onto the ASPIRE, creating a ‘lucky dip’ dynamic, as rotation quality completely depends on your AL (some ASPIREs are like secretaries, or have no connect with ALs) • Baker Hughes praises loyalty, not ability • Vast inequalities between tracks and countries (not in line with standard of living), such as US Supply Chain ASPIREs earning $80K annually, Engineering ASPIREs not receiving the same salary % increase as other tracks, and even different product companies vary with experience, such as OFSE ASPIREs being limited to 1/no international rotations, whilst IET ASPIREs are able to have more than 1 • ‘Business needs’ are continually pushed on you to manipulate your own journey, prioritising immediate needs (short-termism and traditional O&G quarterly cost-focus) • Salary is not competitive once you roll-off into a full time position, and the positions are substandard - many have left after not being paid what they want, or being placed in a stagnant position (backfilling) • American-centric culture, prioritising CST timing for calls, ASPIRE is significantly better in Houston and there is a complete cultural ignorance sometimes, giving Asian and African employees nicknames as they don’t bother to learn someone’s foreign name, and expect them to work late hours (APAC work ridiculous hours, such as 4pm-11am, due to US-orientation)

Explore other reviews about Baker Hughes

5.0
May 26, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Competent management, excellent benefits, competitive pay, and a work life balance that is impossible to compete with

Cons

The totem pole of management is so monumentally tall that the mid and upper management make decisions affecting those on the bottom with no real understanding of what the consequences of their decision are.

4.0
Feb 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Strong strategic direction in the energy transition space. Baker Hughes’ IET segment is well‑positioned at the intersection of industrial technology and decarbonization, and there is real commitment toward innovation in equipment, services, and digital solutions. High-caliber colleagues. The talent level is consistently strong across engineering, product management, and finance. Cross-functional teams are collaborative, and the culture values analytical rigor and thoughtful debate. Exposure to global business. Supporting IET provides insight into diverse markets—LNG, turbomachinery, industrial solutions, new energy—and offers opportunities to partner with teams across multiple regions and product lines. Leadership encourages data-driven decision-making. There is meaningful focus on improving forecasting accuracy, margin discipline, and operational cadence. Finance is seen as a strategic partner, not just a reporting function. Good flexibility and work-life balance. Hybrid work is genuinely supported, especially for roles tied to analysis, planning, and commercial strategy. Strong learning opportunities. Access to digital tools, internal programs, and cross-functional projects helps develop commercial and financial acumen.

Cons

Complex matrix structure. Decision-making can be slower than ideal due to layers of approvals and global coordination. Navigating legacy processes requires patience. Systems and data challenges. Integration of multiple ERPs and planning tools can create inefficiencies and require workarounds. Progress is being made, but modernization is ongoing. Heavy meeting cadence. Operating rhythms can be demanding, especially during forecast cycles and commercial reviews. Calendar load sometimes limits deep work time. Talent development varies by manager. While many leaders invest heavily in development, the experience can vary depending on the team and direct manager. Compensation is fair but not industry-leading. Base pay and bonuses are competitive, but long-term incentives and equity could be stronger compared to peers in the industrial and energy technology sectors.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All