Horrible, political, siloed an hidden agenda driven - Supply Chain Baker Hughes Employee Review

1.0
Sep 21, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some good people who also feel short changed so they tend to stick together.

Cons

Timelines and deadlines are completely unrealistic and there is always a strong route of blame in place for when things hit the wall. There is a real negative culture which is pushed from the top down despite corporate making out that they care about staff. There is no shortage of people willing to stick the knife in to make themselves look good despite being part of the problem route cause. The graduate program which pumps out minimum experience into management roles contributes to problems needs to be refined as it is causing long-service staff to leave the business. Exclusion is a huge problem and if you’re not in a clique then you have no chance, especially when it comes to getting information required to complete tasks. I would never complete an online review but I cannot advise strongly enough to avoid Baker Hughes, especially if you are leaving a secure and enjoyable role.

Explore other reviews about Baker Hughes

5.0
May 26, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Competent management, excellent benefits, competitive pay, and a work life balance that is impossible to compete with

Cons

The totem pole of management is so monumentally tall that the mid and upper management make decisions affecting those on the bottom with no real understanding of what the consequences of their decision are.

4.0
Feb 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Strong strategic direction in the energy transition space. Baker Hughes’ IET segment is well‑positioned at the intersection of industrial technology and decarbonization, and there is real commitment toward innovation in equipment, services, and digital solutions. High-caliber colleagues. The talent level is consistently strong across engineering, product management, and finance. Cross-functional teams are collaborative, and the culture values analytical rigor and thoughtful debate. Exposure to global business. Supporting IET provides insight into diverse markets—LNG, turbomachinery, industrial solutions, new energy—and offers opportunities to partner with teams across multiple regions and product lines. Leadership encourages data-driven decision-making. There is meaningful focus on improving forecasting accuracy, margin discipline, and operational cadence. Finance is seen as a strategic partner, not just a reporting function. Good flexibility and work-life balance. Hybrid work is genuinely supported, especially for roles tied to analysis, planning, and commercial strategy. Strong learning opportunities. Access to digital tools, internal programs, and cross-functional projects helps develop commercial and financial acumen.

Cons

Complex matrix structure. Decision-making can be slower than ideal due to layers of approvals and global coordination. Navigating legacy processes requires patience. Systems and data challenges. Integration of multiple ERPs and planning tools can create inefficiencies and require workarounds. Progress is being made, but modernization is ongoing. Heavy meeting cadence. Operating rhythms can be demanding, especially during forecast cycles and commercial reviews. Calendar load sometimes limits deep work time. Talent development varies by manager. While many leaders invest heavily in development, the experience can vary depending on the team and direct manager. Compensation is fair but not industry-leading. Base pay and bonuses are competitive, but long-term incentives and equity could be stronger compared to peers in the industrial and energy technology sectors.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All