It is what it is - Anonymous employee Mintel Employee Review

2.0
Nov 18, 2016
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Working from home, free coffee, parties where alcohol flows like a river, MVP awards - if you are the lucky recipient, you get £250 and dinner/drinks out.

Cons

Where to even start.. This is a company that rewards mediocrity and staying within prescribed boundaries, while trying to appear innovative and cutting-edge. Management and HR encourage a negative on-edge culture, where employees know that everyone is dispensable. This creates an impression that, as an employee, you are not worth listening to and do not have any value. Indeed, there are no attempts to solicit feedback from those lower down the company chain. Agile working and no assigned desks means people try to come in earlier and earlier in the morning to get the desks they want, which is (of course) better for the business, but illustrates the basic lack of respect for the worker-bees. What's more, HR has decided that it would be a great idea to rotate groups of desks/shuffle groups of people between different floors and the two existing offices every 3 months, creating an atmosphere of permanent uncertainty, as if to keep people on their toes. The company is very tight-fisted with certain groups of employees (analysts), yet showers others with perks (sales). Certain people travel internationally all the time - you hardly see them in the office. For the rest of the company, there is no budget even for a trade magazine subscription. This makes for an atmosphere of unfairness and disgruntlement. Though maybe constant cake may make people forget about the otherwise depressing environment. The open plan office/parties with booze are geared towards the youngest employees, but that won't make them forget about the absence of a good pension scheme or any other benefits for that matter. Plenty of others have also mentioned no/very stingy pay rises. No career progression (the newly created hierarchy of research positions is a joke, to say the least). The business model of hiring graduates on low salaries to do research for 1-2 years until they leave for greener pastures has worked so far (though I do wonder how much money is being wasted on all the hiring and training), but Mintel should seriously consider whether or not this is a sustainable model if they want to be a leading market research company. At the moment, and much like many of the other MR agencies in Central London, Mintel is a company that's good for a recent grad for 1-2 years tops, not a long-term career building opportunity.

Explore other reviews about Mintel

5.0
Jun 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great place to learn and exchange ideas Great middle management Smart colleagues

Cons

Limited growth Shaky leadership Seem to be outsourcing a lot to AI

3.0
Jun 24, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Mintel offers the opportunity to work on interesting research questions for well-known, high-quality brands, which keeps the work engaging and intellectually stimulating. The people are a standout strength of the organization. Colleagues are smart, collaborative, and genuinely care about both the work and each other. There is a strong sense of professionalism and dedication across teams, and you can learn a lot from peers with deep industry expertise.

Cons

Internal systems and processes can make it difficult to operate efficiently. Frequent changes to workflows, priorities, and team structures create ongoing disruption, requiring constant adjustment that can slow down work and impact consistency and quality. Career growth opportunities can be limited depending on your team and role. When advancement opportunities do arise, they do not always come with meaningful compensation increases, which can be frustrating for high-performing employees taking on more responsibility. The culture is performance-driven and, at times, can feel unsustainable. Employees are often expected to do more with less, especially during periods of change, which can lead to burnout. While leadership messaging is generally positive and supportive in tone, there can be a noticeable gap between what is communicated and what is experienced day to day. Strategic priorities also tend to shift frequently, with significant investment in new initiatives that do not always yield results. This can contribute to a sense of instability, especially when those shifts are followed by restructuring or layoffs. As a result, even strong performers may feel a lack of long-term security.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All