Not a newsroom - Reporter S&P Global Employee Review

2.0
Dec 15, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good place if you just want to earn a living and enjoy the benefits.

Cons

The news division is not a newsroom, and it's obvious as soon as you enter the place. It's quiet, and editors and reporters just sit at the computer like robots, racing against time to meet the daily quota. Even though it claims to pursue "journalism", it suffers a severe identity crisis. It is trying to be both a Bloomberg/Reuters-type quick-paced newswire and an in-depth analytical publisher utilising proprietary data. Because of this lack of direction and focus, there is no system in place to train/guide the reporters - the managers have no idea what kind of training is necessary. I've never been in a newsroom where the sole responsibility lies in the reporter, and the editor screams at you for a single spelling mistake and marks you down for non-substantial mistakes, even though they have also played a part in the product. A lot of energy is used on blaming and pointing fingers. The assessment system is designed based not on the quality and value of the content of the article, but on administrative factors such as whether the reporter remembered to attach source documents. Worst of all, it does everything it can to ensure constant insecurity among the reporters.

Explore other reviews about S&P Global

5.0
Jun 24, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great culture with fair compensation, benefits moderate

Cons

Moderate benefits, frequent management changes

1
1.0
Jun 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Benefits were nice, pay was acceptable

Cons

Good luck using unlimited PTO or taking paternal leave, this company is bleeding talent from self inflicted wounds and replacing it as quick as possible with folks in India or APAC. I at this company for years and only encountered 1 leader with a spine that cared about people. S&P immediately cut DEI after trump was elected and relabeled everything to “people first” but it’s hard to see where the people are first in any category. CEO is out of touch along with most leaders once they hit director level. This company is another example of using AI to replace people and the product is sloppy. Once something is “automated” they fire at least 25% of the team. I would encourage you to stay job hunting even if you accept a role at this company, never forget you are a number at S&P.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All