Specsavers reviews

3.4

55% would recommend to a friend

(2,931 total reviews)
avatar

Doug Perkins

64% approve of CEO

51% positive business outlook

Specsavers has an employee rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 2,931 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Specsavers employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Retail and wholesale industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

3K reviews
1.0
Mar 25, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- The analysts are fantastic; despite everything that might happen, the volume of work and the stress that is involved with the role, the analysts with knowledge will always be willing to help those who ask for/require assistance. - There are/can a lot of chances for progression and opportunity, but this is largely outside the scope of the IT Service Desk. - bonuses and good benefits, including dental and health care plans

Cons

- Opportunity/Pay During my interview, during training and during my tenure at this company, I made it abundantly clear I was looking to progress and train when I could so I could make this role into a career. I was advised that opportunities, progression and promotions were extremely common. Once I was past my probation, outside a single paid course that gave a certification as a service desk analyst (a certificate that did not assist in day to day functions), I was not offered any further training despite constant requests to management. The only internal team opportunities available was senior analyst role which required training I could not get, and not enough of a raise to justify giving up so much free time, with only a few such roles being given out. As mentioned, although opportunity exists outside of the SD, it is not often encouraged and can be extremely difficult to get into.
 PDP was not done until a year of joining the company.

 Pay, when considering the time range the ITSD is open (shifts between 7am-9pm, 7 days a week), the amount of weekends you are required to work, as well as the amount of systems handled, amount of work required, call volume and responsibility expected, is extremely poor, especially when compared to other companies who offer more, with more reliable and better hours, and no weekend work; the pay being offered, especially for those with little to no IT experience, is considerably less for those who have no experience in service desk or IT work even after bonuses and raises. - Training:- In response to negative reviews, specifically numerous mentions that this role is only suited for people looking for a basic entry into the IT world, the ITSD released a hiring campaign that called that out, specifically mentioning that "you don't need a technical background to work in our IT department". However, this reaction seems ill thought-out. I have no issues about hiring people who have no knowledge of IT, but this needs to be balanced with significant and absolute training that the ITSD seems unwilling to offer; most tech companies will offer intensive training for those they feel suited for this role, even with lack of training, but since I joined, training has become significantly shorter (going from months to weeks to days) and support was largely placed on the shoulders of more experienced members, with the expectations newer members of the team asking for assistance on calls trying to fix basic systems they have no experience or training in, who are all leaving due to increasing pressure, stress and lack of progression. (For example, numerous fixes require SQL, all of which cannot be run due to the lack of trained members of staff; and staff who were able to run it were unable due to increased demands). 

This is mentioned in other reviews; in response a newer recruitment video was released, mentioning 6 weeks training scheme. Speaking with newer members, the idea of “6 weeks training” seems like a complete fabrication as the general consensus is that aside from a few days of powerpoint and a few sit-in sessions, most new members of staff are placed on the phones within the first few days with only pre-mentioned minute training offered, covering lines we/they had no training in when departments were closed and staff being expected to learn new sectors of the business whilst taking calls for said lines. - ROTA/Time Off 
Flexibility is not easily achieved, and getting time off can be extremely tough.
When I joined I was made aware we would be working weekends, however I was not made aware that these cannot be booked off, the only way weekends can be taken off is if you are able to swap with a follow SD analyst. 
I often had witnessed fellow call agents having to take laptops to work whilst on holiday because they were unable to find someone who would be able swap weekends.
 (I am not sure if this has changed since my leaving). Also of note, as of my leaving a full 2021 schedule had not been released despite numerous requests and team leads having access to a full years schedule. - STATS 
Before leaving a new stat system was put into place. I have no issues with stats, as they are extremely important to make sure that a system and those within it are working to an officiant standard, however they have created stat system that concentrates on stats instead of fixes, and is seemingly a system that is designed around easy failure and really isn't representative of, nor is it taking into account or able to show individual strength and skills. The stats didn't take into account tickets estate wide issues, tickets that required extra care and would not have been resolved without a few extra minutes care/observation, tickets that were extremely high priority to keep stores functioning, or stores with multiple issues where multiple tickets might have to be written, but only time on the call is counted. The issue I see is that without the proper training when people join the team they will fall at the first hurdle and are turning the IT service desk into a call centre where we are expected to implement IT fixes. I feel like at some point management need to decide if the team will be a call centre with SD members who log the issues with a separate actioning team, or a team of IT experts who investigate who run fixes.

 Calls can run over from the end of the shift, or handover when the UK lines close (making sure that phone lines have changed from the UK to Australia) can overrun by an extended amount of time, but can be difficult to get compensated, however you can be called up if you are a second late logging in, even with computer issues (I often got told that 10 seconds late is unacceptable when, on the previous night, I had a call run over 20-50 minutes of my shift end, and the same situation where the handover ran over 45 minutes late). Workload can be unbearable at times, with calls being required to be wrapped up within 15 minutes, and tickets written within 1 minute. - HR Payroll have not sent out my P45, and I have been unable to contact anyone regarding this, nor have I received any further updates. Another former employee is also facing this problem, and has not had access to their P45 for over a month after leaving the company, despite daily attempts to make contact.

2.0
Mar 16, 2017

Avoid if you value your mental health!

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

On the whole the customers within the stores are great, often friendly and a pleasure to serve. The store in which I'm based is open 6 days a week with no late nights, others will be different.

Cons

There is a culture within Spevsavers which encourages bullying and harassment. The management seem very reluctant to deal with this. Most staff within my store and the two other stores own by our directors have at some point been off work sick with stress and/or anxiety. The level of skills and knowledge needed for a role which pays minimum wage is ridiculous, should be paying staff more! The bonus scheme is laughable! There is no sick pay, only ssp. There are courses available to enhance your skills but you will not get paid while going on them, despite them being run by specsavers and having to wear specsavers uniform to attend. They will pay travel expenses...........eventually! I am still waiting for travel expenses to be paid from my last course 4 months ago and have cancelled the next one as I refuse to do it until I get the money repaid from last time.

2.0
Apr 4, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Among the team that work there, is a real sense of support and comradeship, with it being one of the few places where I had no trouble dealing with not only the clientele on the phones, but the other members of staff. It's easy to find people in the organisation who are willing to support and always lend a hand. There is also ample Overtime to be had, which if planned correctly, can net you significant extras on pay checks. If you don't mind the below cons, feel comfortable on phones and want some decent cash, there is potential here. Once you understand the flow of incidents, the teams at play and where to point things you don't know, this is a busy, but not overly stressful job. Given keeping your head down, if you're coming into this with experience, you can coast.

Cons

The desk's sole metric for success is KPI's, or service targets, both within the desk itself and from the rest of the business. This is the benchmark that you, your boss, and your boss' boss are measured against, with very little wiggle room, and this might single-handedly be the biggest cause and effect to why so many people are having issues with the Management. The immediate obvious knock on effect to a system like this, is that problems are often left by the wayside for the phone stats. Whilst the desk is measured by the metrics such as "answering phone calls within x time" and "you solve X% of calls on the phone", this leaves many tickets to stew and die in the backlog, a frequent problem, leading to complaints, escalations, and in extreme cases, big issues that go unnoticed. It's easy to look at the shiny green phone call time, but miss that X store has had a complex issue sitting around for over a month, only getting worse with time, causes problems, and the sort of problem that doesn't get picked up in statistics. This is far from the only effect though, and another big emphasis is Rota Management, a contentious issue from the higher ups at present writing, that has caused a massive amount of disturbance, for moving from an arguably flawed open system with everyone's eyes on (to point out issues) to a closed system, where communication to who is in on a given day is passed around in hushed tones. This system, for all of the hype and preamble to roll this out, has not only lead to the same issues as the rota before, but has created new gaps (shift swaps not going through, weird rota schedules with day timing, etc) that also can't be now overseen by other staff members. Another big issue that the KPI hunting bleeds into is training. I say this with the upmost respect for the people who do the training, but the statement that you get "6 weeks training" is pure fabrication, and has zero basis in the reality of how you are set up to start working there. Whilst there are people who are willing to guide and support you, and a big genuine effort has been placed on improving the knowledge base system as of late, this simply cannot make up for the lack of prep you are given before being thrown to the wolves, often lacking access to the basic tools that you are needed to do the job, leading to stalled tickets, broken SLA's, escalations, etc. This is, again, in aid of getting the phone numbers to look good, KPI bleeding into everything it can. The above rings true for nearly all analysts on the desk, but not all. Some are very much spared this measuring stick, as they have specific tasks only they can do (because everyone else who could do them has left), and a less than ideal amount of effort is spent training up individuals to replace or assist them. For one of the more common tasks on the desk (database work), Nearly all training for this has to be done, out of hours, with very few breaks in for those people who do want to learn, but need to be taught. This causes SLA's to be missed, and stores to be unhappy. The above rings true for the non-senior analysts, but the actual senior/level 2 team is a desecrated shell of its former self, Partially in aid of bridging the communication gap between the two teams, but again, KPI rearing its ugly head when you can use senior members of staff to throw at the phones to make the number of queueing calls go down. For all intents and purposes, there is no longer a senior team. There is a team of a few people, who are occasionally given more serious tasks, but will invariably be used as another body to throw into the statistics grinder as needed. As pretentious and conflictory as it sounds, they are seniors because they have certain skills and experience that the non-seniors do not have, and you have to utilise that. You are wasting those who can do database work by having them spend 7 1/2 hours a day doing password resets, It's cutting off one's nose to spite one's face. You are giving people who can do tasks others cannot an easy out. You are also vastly underutilizing them when the time comes to it, so they can be both lazy and ungovernable. A Undertrained, micromanaged analyst desk, with a fractured, muddled senior division, management blinkers firmly set on the data, with far reaching knock on effects to everyone in the business, that are sweeped under the rug, as the agreed numbers are all green.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 2,931 Reviews

Glassdoor has 3,171 Specsavers reviews submitted anonymously by Specsavers employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Specsavers is right for you.