employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Morgan Stanley

Is this your company?

Morgan Stanley reviews

3.9

76% would recommend to a friend

(19,814 total reviews)
avatar

Ted Pick

80% approve of CEO

73% positive business outlook

Morgan Stanley has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 19,814 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Morgan Stanley employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Finance industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

20K reviews
1.0
Nov 7, 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

It is hard to recommend working for this company, however: Excellent education and learning plans. Easy to work from home (even with short notice) Pay is good Good place to stay for a short while just to learn how NOT to do programming/software development. If you want to coast, then this is the place. If you just keep your head down and shut up in meetings you can linger there forever.

Cons

Indoctrination, they hire grads and interns with little or no experience and drill into them that this is a great place to be. After which it is impossible to carry a healthy self-critical conversation with them. The propaganda posters are the worst with their graphs of unlabelled axis touting how great the company is. Institutionalized workforce, they want to mould you to be a "Morgan Stanley" employee. With as little transferable skills as possible. Build everything in house to keep people from acquiring real skills (they even went far enough attempt to build their own programming language). A lot of the younger crowd don't realise this until it is too late. Dull eyes. Lack of talent, the bar is set so incredibly low that you almost have to dig for it. Technical skill of the average programmer is mediocre at best. But their boasting is through the roof, most suffer from a serious case of the Dunning–Kruger effect. Don't even start me on the strats, that sorry bunch of hacks. Overall lack of motivation, no body cares about anything. All talk and no action. People have meetings about having meetings about other meetings and then they go home. Nothing gets done. And if by accident something is done, it is done in the absolutely the worst lacklustre way possible. Political nightmare, nobody seems to be doing any work as they're all busy pointing fingers blaming everyone else, sorry I meant "escalating". People actively inject themselves into conversations that have nothing to do with them. Everybody is scrambling for their own little intern/grad/indian to "manage". Going to team/dept drinks is nothing short of a sickening brown-nosing session which most managers lap up (as most deliberately surround themselves with yes-people). Severely backwards when it comes to technology and software. They're still running on WindowsXP in 2012. Nothing gets upgraded until it is already out-dated, which is a favourite complaint on the in-house mailing list. Actively hostile environment to software developers. Development environment crash constantly (i.e. Visual Studio and Eclipse) due to over-the-top restrictive access controls and antiquated OSs. C++ devs have it the best but only because they use Textpad or something even more primitive. Computers are slow, software is slow, people are slow, EVERYTHING IS SLOW!

1.0
Dec 12, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The benefits to staff are really good.

Cons

We are made to attend all these diversity event but in reality this is just a tick the box. Morgan Stanley Canary Wharf is thriving on individual racism and institutional racism. It is the order of the day for me. You cant even speak up about this. If you speak up the attacks intensifies. You are blacklisted and marked. It feels like skin colour is a big factor in promotion, compensation, bonuses, and the work allocated to you.

2.0
Jan 28, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people there are genuinely good. There is a strong fit on bringing the right personalities in and that is reflected in a collegiate group of people who make a positive working environment. The benefits are such as private medical cover are good, and the firm is very flexible with parental leave which was really appreciated as a new parent. The firm tries to drive an inclusive culture where LGBTQ persons feel valued. It is a strong company to have on your CV.

Cons

For a firm that makes so much money, they are incredibly miserly. Make sure you negotiate a good salary when joining as year on year pay rises are poor. 2024 pay rises were very low (2.x% even for strong performers) with the narrative that it had been a challenging year for the firm. 2025 pay rises were worse (1.x% for some strong performers, with some colleagues not getting any raise), despite a significant focus on reducing costs in the last 12 months and the firm recording very strong results. Bonuses are OK but nothing great compared to market. It feels like the firm are happy to undervalue employees financially and take the risk on attrition than pay fair rises in the first place. Employees have been struggling through a period of double digit inflation and soaring costs while the C suite get double digit pay rises. Annual leave is very poor compared to European firms. Within Legal and Compliance, employees are expected to provide their own equipment for working at home. No budget is given for this. Other departments in the building get an allowance for things like monitors. In recent years the Legal and Compliance department have also been expected to pay for their own Christmas party. Travel to the London office for non-officers is non-existent now and generally needs to be self funded if you do want to go. Even small things which generate goodwill, like letting employees log off early ahead of bank holiday weekends, are being scaled back. Investment in tech and improving systems is minimal and so many processes depend on smart people doing manual work. While the department is currently working on a hybrid basis, there seems to be a general suspicion from senior management about working from home (maybe this is related to why there is no equipment budget; so as not to encourage it). The promotions process, particularly to officer level, is difficult to navigate and without a clear pathway to achievement. There’s calls every so often to ‘demystify’ the process for people; if the process seems like a mystery, something isn’t right. Glasgow is heavily stacked with Directors looking to move up to Vice President so it feels like there’s a queue that isn’t moving along any time soon. And unlike a lot of other companies, you can’t get promoted by successfully applying for a job at the level above your current grade. You have to be nominated, and go through a process where senior people speak up for you, and feels like a lot of ‘playing the game’ instead of coming in, working hard and being good at your job. Even in the main locations, it’s often seen easier to leave, get a promotion at a peer firm and then come back as an officer than actually make it through the promotions process at MS. The MS Glasgow office is what’s called a ‘Global Centre’ - that is, an outsourcing centre. It’s effectively regarded as Mumbai + and this is reflected in the fact a lot of the work done there isn’t particularly interesting or challenging and management feel isn’t valuable enough to merit being done in a main location. It feels like Glasgow supports London rather than working with London; that is perhaps the fact of it but it does give a two-tier vibe to how work is done, and the impression is that if you really want to work on interesting projects, make a good wage and progress your career, maybe you’d be better off in the London office (or somewhere else). If you’re ambitious then, given the issues with pay, promotion and quality of work, it doesn’t feel like an environment to push and challenge yourself. But if you want to work with nice people, earn an OK wage and have a good work life balance, then it’s a pleasant working environment.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 19,814 Reviews

Glassdoor has 24,389 Morgan Stanley reviews submitted anonymously by Morgan Stanley employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Morgan Stanley is right for you.