Pros
I would like to say that the singular 'pro' would be having this employer on your CV. Unfortunately, this is no longer the case. See: 'cons'
Cons
Where to start. This is a dusty, old publisher and they structures and attitudes there mirror this. There are a bulk of people at Director level that have literally no idea of what they are doing. Totally out of touch with their markets, utterly out of touch with staff, out of touch with technology and would be unlikely to last a day anywhere else as their incompetence would be exposed in seconds. Like many old, entrenched structures these middle managers structure and restructure themselves in ways to hide their glowing failure as managers, all the while appointing bonuses and pay raises for themselves-whilst making endless redundancies. They are without question the most unethical company I have worked for-yet hide this behind their valued 'charity' status. They have nothing to do with the University itself as the actual academics at the university want nothing to do with them-for fear that this association will somehow damage their academic reputation. Pay close heed to the hundreds of terrible reviews here and don't make the same mistake that so many of us bright, smart publishing professionals have made. You will be more valued, secure and paid better ANYWHERE else in publishing.