I would give them 0 zeros, but it's not an option - Principal Technical Consultant IBM Employee Review

1.0
Apr 3, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Nothing springs to mind. Really, nothing.

Cons

Watching out to see if you are in this quarter's RA (redundancy action). Assume you will never get a pay rise (because you won't). Wonder at the mindless paperwork (I live in the UK but worked in Europe, so I had to fill in endless forms and interviews to see if I should pay tax in the UK or the host country - despite EU law being clear that I could work abroad for up to 2 years prior to paying tax in the host country. Getting expense forms rejected as you didn't itemise the tax out. Getting expense forms rejected as you did itemise the tax out. Sitting in airports for 6 hours as getting the later flight saved IBM $10. Watching the CEO award herself a $5 million bonus, despite 20 consecutive quarters of declining turnover. The culture is to stab your colleagues in the front and hoard knowledge - never share - you are judged against them, so if you can make them look bad do so. Personal Business Committments (PBC). At the start of the year you make up 30 or so of these and are judged on how well you meet them, not on how well you do your job. So if your job changes, you are screwed. Turn down chargable work to write white papers that no one will read - this makes sense to meet your PBCs. So just no. IBM 20 years ago was an employer of choice. Now it's one to avoid at almost any cost. And to add insult to injury 2 years after I left they threatened me with legal action if I didn't pay them almost £300, with no explanation of what the alleged debt was for. To cut a long story short, they backed down when I pointed out to them that what they were doing was illegal and I welcomed seeing them in court. 6 months after I left they asked me to return. Never!

Explore other reviews about IBM

5.0
Mar 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good work life balance across projects

Cons

Need to keep looking for projects actively

4.0
Aug 26, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Disclaimer: A lot of what I'm writing below of course depends on the work area and management chain. But I found this to be fairly pervasive policies in IBM in my 9+ years with the company. 1. IBM's policies and management are very flexible when it comes to working remotely or accommodating various life situations (sick days, doctor visits, etc.). Management is encouraged to measure an employee by their work and impact, and not by hours spent at their office. 2. Great colleagues! Though unfortunately, many have been leaving due to the instability of IBM's HW development business. 3. At least in my area, there's a high level of flexibility on which projects should I undertake based on my and my management assessment of business impact.

Cons

1. Unfortunately, IBM still uses the "normal distribution" rating system, where at the end of the year each employee is ranked as a top contributor (5%), above average contributor (15%), average contributor (~75%), and bottom contributor (5%). This curve is difficult to apply in the R&D world, where you may have many members of the team working long and hard hours, and end up being "average contributors" at the end of the year, because there just isn't room for all to be top contributors. 2. The above may not be so disturbing, if only IBM didn't practically cancelled all raises, performance bonuses and incentive for the non top-performers. I've had a consistent "above average" rating in the last 4-5 years, and my raise and performance bonus were ridiculous mere 1.5-2% of my salary. Were I rated "average contributor" I would have gotten NOTHING. So you can imagine that people can go year after year without any raise to their salary. From talking to manager friend, this is IBM's way to eliminate the non-top-performers without having to fire them, as part of its direction of reducing US manpower. 3. Hiring freeze in many areas - again, as part of IBM's attempt to reduce its workforce across North America and Europe we see many jobs move to the India and Far East markets. This is of course upsetting to see local teams shrink and disappear, especially when many great local IBM colleagues and experts begin to drop out. From my experience thus far working with India SW teams - they are still very far away from the standards I would have expected from US and Europe based teams. 4. Poor top down communication about company's and divisions' future. Employees learn from rumors and news websites what's about to come...

636
avatar
IBM Response
10y
Thanks for sharing your experience, and we're glad that you've had a positive experience working with talented colleagues and taking advantage of IBM's programs. IBM is in the midst of a major transformation, --our Systems business is going through its own changes to strengthen competitiveness. Change is never easy. As part of our transformation, we just launched a whole new approach for how we are coaching employees, delivering feedback and managing reviews. No distribution guidelines or what some think of as 'stacked rankings." What's particularly great is that this was co-designed with our employee base from all over the world... to the tune of hundreds of thousands of page views, comments, on-line debates and discussions. IBMers even named the new system Checkpoint, to reflect the regular feedback rituals we're adopting. Managers are more empowered with the new methodology to help them acknowledge the great work of their teams and help their employees develop professionally. These steps and more are showing up in our employee surveys as well. So IBMers are feeling the change. We are confident these changes will help us in continuing to attract and retain great talent.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All